[State of Code Evals] After SWE-bench, Code Clash & SOTA Coding Benchmarks recap — John Yang
From creating SWE-bench in a Princeton basement to shipping CodeClash, SWE-bench Multimodal, and SWE-bench Multilingual, John Yang has spent the last year and a half watching his benchmark become the de facto standard for evaluating AI coding agents—trusted by Cognition (Devin), OpenAI, Anthropic, and every major lab racing to solve software engineering at scale. We caught up with John live at NeurIPS 2025 to dig into the state of code evals heading into 2026: why SWE-bench went from ignored (October 2023) to the industry standard after Devin’s launch (and how Walden emailed him two weeks before the big reveal), how the benchmark evolved from Django-heavy to nine languages across 40 repos (JavaScript, Rust, Java, C, Ruby), why unit tests as verification are limiting and long-running agent tournaments might be the future (CodeClash: agents maintain codebases, compete in arenas, and iterate over multiple rounds), the proliferation of SWE-bench variants (SWE-bench Pro, SWE-bench Live, SWE-Efficiency, AlgoTune, SciCode) and how benchmark authors are now justifying their splits with curation techniques instead of just “more repos,” why Tau-bench’s “impossible tasks” controversy is actually a feature not a bug (intentionally including impossible tasks flags cheating), the tension between long autonomy (5-hour runs) vs. interactivity (Cognition’s emphasis on fast back-and-forth), how Terminal-bench unlocked creativity by letting PhD students and non-coders design environments beyond GitHub issues and PRs, the academic data problem (companies like Cognition and Cursor have rich user interaction data, academics need user simulators or compelling products like LMArena to get similar signal), and his vision for CodeClash as a testbed for human-AI collaboration—freeze model capability, vary the collaboration setup (solo agent, multi-agent, human+agent), and measure how interaction patterns change as models climb the ladder from code completion to full codebase reasoning. We discuss: * John’s path: Princeton → SWE-bench (October 2023) → Stanford PhD with Diyi Yang and the Iris Group, focusing on code evals, human-AI collaboration, and long-running agent benchmarks * The SWE-bench origin story: released October 2023, mostly ignored until Cognition’s Devin launch kicked off the arms race (Walden emailed John two weeks before: “we have a good number”) * SWE-bench Verified: the curated, high-quality split that became the standard for serious evals * SWE-bench Multimodal and Multilingual: nine languages (JavaScript, Rust, Java, C, Ruby) across 40 repos, moving beyond the Django-heavy original distribution * The SWE-bench Pro controversy: independent authors used the “SWE-bench” name without John’s blessing, but he’s okay with it (”congrats to them, it’s a great benchmark”) * CodeClash: John’s new benchmark for long-horizon development—agents maintain their own codebases, edit and improve them each round, then compete in arenas (programming games like Halite, economic tasks like GDP optimization) * SWE-Efficiency (Jeffrey Maugh, John’s high school classmate): optimize code for speed without changing behavior (parallelization, SIMD operations) * AlgoTune, SciCode, Terminal-bench, Tau-bench, SecBench, SRE-bench: the Cambrian explosion of code evals, each diving into different domains (security, SRE, science, user simulation) * The Tau-bench “impossible tasks” debate: some tasks are underspecified or impossible, but John thinks that’s actually a feature (flags cheating if you score above 75%) * Cognition’s research focus: codebase understanding (retrieval++), helping humans understand their own codebases, and automatic context engineering for LLMs (research sub-agents) * The vision: CodeClash as a testbed for human-AI collaboration—vary the setup (solo agent, multi-agent, human+agent), freeze model capability, and measure how interaction changes as models improve — John Yang * SWE-bench: https://www.swebench.com * X: https://x.com/jyangballin Full Video Episode Timestamps 00:00:00 Introduction: John Yang on SWE-bench and Code Evaluations00:00:31 SWE-bench Origins and Devon's Impact on the Coding Agent Arms Race00:01:09 SWE-bench Ecosystem: Verified, Pro, Multimodal, and Multilingual Variants00:02:17 Moving Beyond Django: Diversifying Code Evaluation Repositories00:03:08 Code Clash: Long-Horizon Development Through Programming Tournaments00:04:41 From Halite to Economic Value: Designing Competitive Coding Arenas00:06:04 Ofir's Lab: SWE-ficiency, AlgoTune, and SciCode for Scientific Computing00:07:52 The Benchmark Landscape: TAU-bench, Terminal-bench, and User Simulation00:09:20 The Impossible Task Debate: Refusals, Ambiguity, and Benchmark Integrity00:12:32 The Future of Code Evals: Long Autonomy vs Human-AI Collaboration00:14:37 Call to Action: User Interaction Data and Codebase Understanding Research This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.latent.space/subscribe
